Blog

Navigating the Risks: Trends in Medical Malpractice Litigation Related to Intraoperative Neuromonitoring

By Admin | June 03, 2024

In the realm of spine surgery, the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) has become a crucial component in safeguarding patient outcomes. This advanced technology, which involves monitoring the functional integrity of neural structures during surgery, aims to prevent neurological deficits by providing real-time feedback to surgeons. However, as with any medical intervention, the implementation and interpretation of IONM are not without risks. A recent study, leveraging data from the Westlaw Edge legal research service, delved into the intricacies of malpractice litigation related to intraoperative neuromonitoring, revealing significant trends and implications for spine surgeons.

The Study

The primary objective of the study was to identify and analyze trends in malpractice litigation specifically related to the use of neuromonitoring during spine surgery. Researchers isolated cases where plaintiffs alleged negligence either due to the failure to use neuromonitoring or due to negligent monitoring. The study involved a comprehensive review of 26 identified cases, focusing on the type of surgical procedures involved, the professional background of the defendants, and the outcomes of the litigation.

Key Findings

The study's findings highlight critical insights into the legal landscape surrounding intraoperative neuromonitoring:

1. Types of Procedures and Defendants: All 26 cases involved spinal fusion surgeries, a common yet complex procedure often requiring meticulous neuromonitoring. The defendants were almost equally divided between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons, indicating that both specialties face similar risks regarding neuromonitoring-related litigation.
2. Litigation Outcomes: Defense verdicts were the most frequent outcome, occurring in 54% of the cases. Settlements accounted for 27% of the cases, with the remaining 19% resulting in plaintiff verdicts. This distribution underscores the challenging nature of proving negligence in neuromonitoring cases and how important having a trustworthy and competent neuromonitoring team is.
3. Financial Implications: The financial stakes in these litigations were substantial. Settlements averaged $7,575,000 in damage awards, significantly higher than the $4,180,213 average for plaintiff verdicts. These figures reflect the severe consequences of alleged negligence and the high costs associated with malpractice claims.
4. Allegations of Negligence: The basis for litigation was nearly split, with 54% of the cases alleging failure to monitor and 46% alleging negligent monitoring. Notably, the study found no significant differences in case outcomes between these two types of allegations, suggesting that both carry substantial litigation risks.

Implications for Spine Surgeons

The study's conclusions underscore the dual-edged nature of intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine surgery. On one hand, IONM is a vital tool for enhancing patient safety and surgical outcomes. On the other hand, its improper use or interpretation can expose surgeons to significant legal risks. The findings highlight several critical considerations for spine surgeons:

1. Adherence to Standards of Care: Surgeons must adhere strictly to established standards of care regarding the use of neuromonitoring. This includes understanding when monitoring is mandatory and ensuring that the monitoring techniques employed are appropriate for the specific surgical context.
2. Interpreting Neuromonitoring Data: Accurate interpretation of neuromonitoring data is crucial. Surgeons must be well-trained in understanding the nuances of IONM readings and responding appropriately to any changes. This reduces the risk of adverse outcomes and potential negligence claims.
3. Documentation and Communication: Meticulous documentation of neuromonitoring procedures and clear communication with the surgical team are essential. Detailed records can provide critical evidence in defense against malpractice claims.

Learn More About IONM

Intraoperative neuromonitoring represents a significant advancement in spine surgery, offering a powerful means to prevent neurological damage during complex procedures. However, as the study reveals, it also introduces new avenues for malpractice litigation. Spine surgeons must navigate these risks by adhering to high standards of care, maintaining rigorous training in neuromonitoring techniques, and ensuring comprehensive documentation. By doing so, they can leverage the benefits of IONM while mitigating the associated legal risks, ultimately enhancing patient safety and surgical success. Choosing a neuromonitoring team that is thorough and competent is incredibly important.

For more information on the benefits of neuromonitoring and its role in enhancing patient care, please contact us at 888-344-2947.

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33130617/